← Search

Jane Bodner

Columbus, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 2W–20L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jane Bodner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
Colleen Mathews / Stephanie Johnson
2026-04-10 · Olympic 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-13 · Olympic 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Simons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Christina Kulesa / Elizabeth Thomas
2026-02-20 · Olympic 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Gockstetter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-13 · Olympic 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-06 · Olympic 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Kellerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
L
2025-12-19 · Olympic 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-12-05 · Olympic 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hallie Raskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-21 · Olympic 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Hollo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-11-07 · Olympic 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Kellerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-12 · Olympic 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hallie Raskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-04-25 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hallie Raskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-21 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hallie Raskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
9.1%
2W–20L · 34% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova