← Search

Jennifer Columbus

Tucson, AZ
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
95 matches · 47W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Columbus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
L
2025-12-15 · Fierce 55s · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marie-Louis Galegor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-12-08 · Fierce 55s · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2025-12-05 · Bad News Broads · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Wozniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-12-02 · Bad News Broads · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-01 · Fierce 55s · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marie-Louis Galegor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-11-10 · Fierce 55s · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marie-Louis Galegor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-11-06 · Bad News Broads · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Steehler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-11-01 · Bad News Broads · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Steehler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-22 · Bad News Broads · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Birgit Allmann-Treusch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Heritage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Wozniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 41.1% of games
4.0
43.5%
30W–39L · 46.5% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 54.7% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.9% of games
7.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 65.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 25% of the time
#3 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#1 Singles
22%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
21 matches
#2 Singles
16%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer