← Search

Caryn Barman

Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 91W–135L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Caryn Barman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history226 matches
W
2026-08-02 · Mixed Plate · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jesus Escarcega mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · Mixed Plate · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonah Kraenzel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-06-28 · Mixed Plate · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonah Kraenzel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
Lisa Brady / Chelsea Fuller
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Annette Volle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-08 · Mixed Plate · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonah Kraenzel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-05 · Net Threats · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Overlund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · Net Threats · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonia Pleasant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-22 · Net Threats · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Bohan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-22 · WHATHappened? · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-15 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suo Ji
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbi Holden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-22 · Net Threats · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suo Ji
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
53.3%
16W–14L · 51.4% of games
3.5
34.6%
44W–83L · 45.6% of games
4.0
40.7%
11W–16L · 43.8% of games
7.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.8% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
6.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.2% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
57 matches
#1 Singles
16%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
31 matches
#2 Singles
9%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert