← Search

Tammy Willett

Virginia Beach, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
227 matches · 136W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tammy Willett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history227 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Smith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Camden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-26 · Smith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Farr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Winston · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roland Nave mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-19 · Smith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Farr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · Winston · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Dey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Cory Dunn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Janet Marx championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · Smith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Camden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-06 · Cowen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Cowen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · Cowen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Branch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · Cowen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Branch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · Camden · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cory Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 53.6% of games
3.5
70.9%
73W–30L · 57.5% of games
4.0
18.2%
4W–18L · 37% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 64.6% of games
7.0
69.2%
18W–8L · 58.8% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.7%
15W–11L · 50.5% of games
7.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 59.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
89 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
54 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova