← Search

Christine Cowen

Virginia Beach, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
204 matches · 107W–97L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Christine Cowen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history204 matches
W
2026-08-06 · Cowen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tammy Willett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · Cowen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glenda Craddock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-21 · Camden · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenda Craddock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-16 · Cowen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Durso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · Farr - ABWT · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Marx
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · Camden · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Rebecca Norman / Allison Quinly
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Megan Farr championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
Sunanda Desai / Mary Kirchoff
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Lauren Kiger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Tammy Willett championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · Cowen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Marx
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Farr - ABWT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Campen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-07 · Camden · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Farr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
90.6%
29W–3L · 69.3% of games
3.5
59.5%
44W–30L · 53.9% of games
4.0
12.5%
4W–28L · 33.2% of games
6.5
50%
6W–6L · 45.2% of games
7.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 58.7% of games
7.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 39.7% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 49.5% of games
6.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 41% of games
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
36 matches
#2 Singles
8%
16 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#3 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova