← Search

Jeff Nelson

OVERLAND PARK, KS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 52W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeff Nelson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
L
2025-11-01 · Craig, John · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Grier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-25 · Craig, John · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Grier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-11 · Craig, John · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Brez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-27 · Craig, John · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Grier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-06-19 · Craig, John · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-17 · Craig, John · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Beltrame
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-13 · Craig, John · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caroline VanDeusen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-06-08 · HOAWC/Fabrizius/55&over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Duntz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-05-20 · Craig, John · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irwin Don
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-05-18 · HOAWC/Fabrizius/55&over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randall Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-05-06 · Craig, John · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Wimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-04-27 · HOAWC/Fabrizius/55&over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
55.7%
34W–27L · 51.6% of games
7.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
14W–7L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe