← Search

Brett Matheson

Colorado Springs, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 34W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brett Matheson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-07-14 · LTFCS DARK · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-30 · LTFCS DARK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Gaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · LTFCS DARK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Gaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · LTFCS DARK · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · LTFCS DARK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Ernst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-26 · LTFCS DARK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Gaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-12 · LTFCS DARK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Spencer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-05 · LTFCS DARK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Gaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-21 · LTFCS DARK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Spencer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-15 · LTFCS DARK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Ockerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-08 · LTFCS DARK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Ockerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-17 · LTFCS DARK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
48.3%
28W–30L · 47.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 32.7% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 51.9% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
22 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams