← Search

William Tostanoski

— year-end
92 matches · 21W–71L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add William Tostanoski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-08-25 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Tompkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harsha Nagaraj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-04 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Tompkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-28 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Tompkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harsha Nagaraj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · CCW SCOTT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Bugno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-30 · CCW SCOTT · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rande Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-16 · CCW SCOTT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Tompkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · CCW SCOTT · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · CCW SCOTT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Pritchard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-19 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
27.3%
18W–48L · 44.7% of games
4.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 38% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0%
0W–8L · 26.2% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 25% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams