← Search

James Gaston

Colorado Springs, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 33W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Gaston to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-06-30 · LTFCS DARK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brett Matheson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · LTFCS DARK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brett Matheson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · LTFCS DARK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Ernst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · LTFCS DARK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · LTFCS DARK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-26 · LTFCS DARK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brett Matheson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-19 · LTFCS DARK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · LTFCS DARK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-05 · LTFCS DARK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brett Matheson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-28 · LTFCS DARK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Ernst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-21 · LTFCS DARK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-14 · LTFCS DARK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
46.2%
30W–35L · 47.7% of games
7.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 45.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams