← Search

Iris Friedman

Scarsdale, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 65W–76L · seasons 2017–2026

Captains: add Iris Friedman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
L
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yvonne Iversen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Schur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-26 · Grand Slam: Net Flicks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yvonne Iversen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-29 · Grand Slam: Net Flicks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Falconer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-02 · WTC Cryptoballers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erika Jaeger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-16 · Sportime Harbor Island · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Gaviser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-28 · Sportime Lake Isle · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvonne Iversen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-11-18 · Sportime Harbor Island · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvonne Iversen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2024-11-13 · Sportime Harbor Island · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Durland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2024-10-21 · Sportime Harbor Island · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvonne Iversen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-05-22 · Metro: Keefe · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tania de Chiara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-4
L
2024-05-16 · Metro: Keefe · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erika Jaeger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
58.3%
28W–20L · 53.4% of games
3.5
41.4%
36W–51L · 45.4% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
33 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe