← Search

Michelle Jung

— year-end
132 matches · 89W–43L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Michelle Jung to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
W
2026-09-08 · RRC Racquettes 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julianne Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-13 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yuka Endo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Renee Koevary / Anne Moretti
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erika Jaeger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-5
W
Mary Bianchi / Dana Perriello
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Hoft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · CP:Topspinners 18+ Summer:das Neves/Philip · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Taylor Esposito / Danielle Martell
2026-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-17 · CP:Topspinners 18+ Summer:das Neves/Philip · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evelyn Hagenow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Hoft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susanne Sparks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-03-17 · Rye Racquette Club: Racquettes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Teams30 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 79.2% of games
3.0
81.6%
31W–7L · 60.5% of games
3.5
58.8%
50W–35L · 52.7% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
26 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer