← Search

Sherri Matney

— year-end
139 matches · 46W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sherri Matney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-06-11 · Play It Forward · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Engroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-03 · HCC Platinum Plus · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Sykes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · Play It Forward · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Barnum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-19 · Play It Forward · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoLyn Janecko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · HCC Queen Bee’s · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Engroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-05 · Diva Thunder · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Sykes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-04 · HCC Queen Bee’s · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoLyn Janecko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-30 · Diva Thunder · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Sykes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · Diva Thunder · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Barnum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-21 · Diva Thunder · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Sykes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-16 · Diva Thunder · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Engroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-15 · HCC Queen Bee’s · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Flume
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
55%
11W–9L · 54% of games
3.5
30%
21W–49L · 41.8% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
29.8%
14W–33L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova