← Search

Alice Livesay

EAGLE, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 112W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alice Livesay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Mixed Signals · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Stewart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-08 · VAMOS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patrik Martinet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-09-01 · VAMOS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lee Parsons mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-28 · Mixed Signals · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gary Lim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-25 · VAMOS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patrik Martinet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-1
W
2026-08-11 · VAMOS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patrik Martinet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · Mixed Signals · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · with Caleb Roope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Burriesci championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · YOURS! · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Bee Ping Ong Mullin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-09 · YOURS! · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Bee Ping Ong Mullin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · YOURS! · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Esther Rowland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
87.9%
51W–7L · 69.6% of games
3.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.2% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.8% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 58.3% of games
6.5mixed
87.5%
14W–2L · 59% of games
7.0mixed
89.5%
17W–2L · 66.8% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 38.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#1 Singles
17%
24 matches
#2 Singles
14%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
16 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova