← Search

Lisa Mears

— year-end
131 matches · 45W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Mears to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
2026-07-25 · X18 6.0 HF Brahler · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Curtis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · A18 3.0W NC2 Zeiger · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslynne Leeper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · A18 3.0W NC2 Zeiger · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jen Zeiger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-01 · A18 3.0W NC2 Zeiger · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · A18 3.0W NC2 Zeiger · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-10 · A18 3.0W NC2 Zeiger · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslynne Leeper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Andrea MacChiarella / Jeff Scafaro
2026-06-07 · X18 6.0 HF Brahler · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Curtis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-27 · A18 3.0W NC2 Zeiger · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-13 · A18 3.0W NC2 Zeiger · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-04-18 · A18 3.0W NC1 Adams · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Dimos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · A18 3.0W NC1 Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Slee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-07 · A18 3.0W NC1 Adams · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jen Zeiger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 65.3% of games
3.0
27%
20W–54L · 44.3% of games
5.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 49.4% of games
6.5
6.2%
1W–15L · 30.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
8 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer