← Search

Erin Farleigh

Holly Springs, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 71W–42L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Erin Farleigh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-09-02 · ACP.Murdock · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Colleen Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Kelsey Kowalski / Leah Johnson
2026-08-30 · Me.Delorme18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mallory Biringer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · TOC.Murdock · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-13 · TOC.Murdock · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-05 · TOC.Murdock · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · Li.Murdock18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Clare Rosemeyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-0
W
Julian Black / Allison Turner
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Ayako Otsuka championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · TOC.Rosemeyer · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kyle Hudson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · Li.Murdock18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sapna Varkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-11 · TOC.Rosemeyer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Abhimanyu Joshi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · TOC.Rosemeyer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kyle Hudson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · TOC.Allen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sapna Varkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
72.2%
39W–15L · 60.6% of games
4.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.1% of games
7.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 46.3% of games
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 42.6% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.1% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
17 matches
#2 Singles
12%
14 matches
#1 Singles
10%
11 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer