← Search

Elizabeth Gordon

Peterborough, NH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 22W–19L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Gordon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-08-30 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Merrow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · MITC:Foley:Olney · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodine Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-10 · MITC:Foley:Olney · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackeline Olney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · MITC:Foley:Olney · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackeline Olney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-21 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Bennett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-07 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ned Olney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-05 · MITC:Foley:Bensen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jackeline Olney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-05 · MITC:Foley:Bensen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-10-30 · MITC:Foley:Bensen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Williamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-16 · MITC:Foley:Bensen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Liz Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-04-03 · MITC:Harrington:Foley · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Senora Linder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-01-16 · MITC:Harrington:Foley · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 40.4% of games
8.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 51.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova