← Search

Bryan Howell

Brandon, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 75W–37L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Bryan Howell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-07-09 · McCoy, Landon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madison Mahaffey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · Howell, Bryan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Eaton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-11 · McCoy, Landon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jayme Griffin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · McCoy, Landon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madison Mahaffey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · Walker, Niven · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Carmody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-07 · Sims, Jonathan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Haile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-24 · Sims, Jonathan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-17 · Sims, Jonathan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Conner Fudge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-03 · Sims, Jonathan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
Mark Howard / Tim Davis
2026-03-02 · Walker, Niven · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Haile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-10 · Sims, Jonathan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Haile
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Tim Davis / Wesley Whitehead
2026-02-09 · Walker, Niven · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Stubbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 58.5% of games
4.0
64.9%
24W–13L · 58.7% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.4% of games
7.5
72%
18W–7L · 58.4% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.1% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
30 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams