← Search

Tara Sengupta

Royal Oak, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 66W–32L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Tara Sengupta to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
W
2026-08-04 · LT-Pietrangelo 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sridhar Ravikoti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Ana Rotar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-3
L
2026-07-31 · LT-Pietrangelo 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sridhar Ravikoti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-31 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Kim Baslock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · TROY-Li 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Bell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-17 · TROY-Li 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Olmstead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · WESS-Li 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · FAC- Brandt 18s 4.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · LT-Pietrangelo 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sridhar Ravikoti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · WESS-Li 18s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · LT-Pietrangelo 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dan Lawrence mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
90%
18W–2L · 69.4% of games
4.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 45.4% of games
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.1% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 74% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 44.6% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 74.4% of games
8.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#1 Singles
21%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
14 matches
#2 Singles
9%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova