← Search

McCall Monte

GROSSE POINTE WOODS, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
256 matches · 176W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add McCall Monte to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history256 matches
W
2026-08-31 · EAST-KEAN 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Zak Kwiecinski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-19 · EAST-Kean 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Varner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · EAST-KEAN 7.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Zak Kwiecinski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
Montana Crawford / William Brenner
2026-08-11 · EAST-Kean 18s 9.0X F · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Kean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
Montana Crawford / William Brenner
2026-08-06 · EAST-Kean 18s 9.0X F · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Kean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-05 · EAST-Kean 8.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Kean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-04 · EAST-Kean 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Sutts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-31 · EAST-Kean 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Sutts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Peter Wagner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-17 · EAST-Kean 18s 9.0X F · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Julian Olejnik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-07-16 · EAST-Monte 18s 5.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Antonia Burkhard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · EAST-Monte 18s 5.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Carla Jewell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 67.2% of games
4.5
68.9%
51W–23L · 56.8% of games
5.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 57.1% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 50.5% of games
8.5
80.8%
21W–5L · 63% of games
9.0
80%
8W–2L · 66.9% of games
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 32.4% of games
7.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.3% of games
8.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 65.8% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
75.8%
25W–8L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
115 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
43 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer