← Search

Elissa Bayraktar

Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 121W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elissa Bayraktar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history173 matches
W
2026-08-11 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Doug Biske mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pete Bryant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Laura LeVasseur championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-3
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Frances Carlson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Frances Carlson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Li mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · #4 Doubles · with Susie Pearson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-17 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Harley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-16 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christie Dickinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · LIB-Arthur 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dae-Hee Kwak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Rademacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-19 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerri-Ann Croftchik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75.8%
25W–8L · 59.7% of games
4.0
65.1%
28W–15L · 54.7% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 60.4% of games
7.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.6% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
39 matches
#1 Singles
6%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams