← Search

Jay Osman

Biloxi, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 32W–62L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jay Osman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-08-31 · TOCC - Radius 6.5 40+ 2026 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brent Bingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · TOCC - Radius 6.5 40+ 2026 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tristan Armer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-30 · TOCC-McMillan · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Stewart Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-07 · TOCC - Blevins · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Pilger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · TOCC - Blevins · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Pilger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
Angela Vo / Khoa Nguyen
2026-06-22 · TOCC - Blevins · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Schyler St Amant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
Derek Mitchell / Khoa Nguyen
2026-05-18 · TOCC - Wilkerson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Brouckaert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-12 · TOCC - Byrd · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Wilkerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-27 · TOCC Radius · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-23 · TOCC - Byrd · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Wilkerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-16 · TOCC - Wilkerson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Derek Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-06 · TOCC Radius · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
44.4%
20W–25L · 49.2% of games
3.5
4%
1W–24L · 30.6% of games
5.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.9% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.2% of games
3.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 67% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 30% of the time
#1 Singles
30%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#2 Singles
7%
7 matches
#3 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert