← Search

Adam Wilkerson

Ocean Springs, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 45W–70L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Adam Wilkerson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
L
2026-08-13 · TOCC - Radius 6.5 40+ 2026 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bob Thunelius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-06 · TOCC - Radius 6.5 18+ 2026 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Damon Westfaul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
Khoa Nguyen / Tyler Patin
2026-07-15 · TOCC Tri. 18+. Radius · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brice Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · TOCC - Blevins · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Brumley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Blevins TOCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Chapman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · TOCC Tri. 18+. Radius · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jordan Roussel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-08 · TOCC - Blevins · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Brumley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
Sean Murphy / Jo Anne Besselievre
2026-05-18 · TOCC - Blevins · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Brumley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-12 · TOCC - Byrd · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Osman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-27 · TOCC Radius · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Mcmillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · TOCC - Byrd · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Osman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-16 · TOCC - Wilkerson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with William Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
44.9%
22W–27L · 50.2% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 26.5% of games
5.5
40%
4W–6L · 41.7% of games
6.5
20%
4W–16L · 43.8% of games
2.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 50.5% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
18 matches
#3 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe