← Search

Caroline Marvin

Englewood, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 69W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Caroline Marvin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-08-25 · ATC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · ATC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · ATC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-13 · ATC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · ATC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · ATC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · ATC GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · LEBTC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · ATC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · LEBTC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-02 · ATC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-05-26 · ATC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
89.5%
17W–2L · 64.7% of games
4.0
82%
50W–11L · 64.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer