← Search

Angela Harper

Arvada, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
232 matches · 122W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Angela Harper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history232 matches
W
2026-08-25 · NJ BLACK · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanna Donalson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donald Harper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-18 · NJ BLACK · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Bonczynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · NJ BLACK · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Shibao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donald Harper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-06 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Stafford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · NJ BLACK · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Bonczynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · NJ BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donald Harper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · NJ GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Stafford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miki Aylesworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-08 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Shibao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · NJ GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eve Wall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
72.1%
44W–17L · 58.6% of games
4.0
47.1%
40W–45L · 49.4% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 61.5% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.6% of games
7.5mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
32.5%
13W–27L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
49 matches
#1 Singles
8%
19 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer