← Search

Brooke Butterfield

ROCHESTER HILLS, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 25W–45L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Brooke Butterfield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Stacey Mondragon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Mondragon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-08 · EAST-Monte 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon Babcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-01 · EAST-Monte 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marcia Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-30 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Mondragon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · EAST-Monte 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-04 · EAST-Monte 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Juhi Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-20 · EAST-Monte 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-19 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luminita Varos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-12 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erica Henderson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
80%
8W–2L · 60.8% of games
4.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 42.5% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#2 Singles
19%
13 matches
#1 Singles
16%
11 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe