← Search

Emily Gessner

Beverly Hills, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 142W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Gessner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history213 matches
W
2026-07-15 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maggie Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-17 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Olivia Underwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Enright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-04 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maggie Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sali Refka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-21 · TROY-Strachan Tri MED Women F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-01 · TROY-Strachan Tri MED Women F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maggie Knight
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-11-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Lowe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Eaton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bridget O'Hara
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Lowe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
50%
5W–5L · 52.6% of games
3.5
100%
17W–0L · 75% of games
4.0
91.7%
44W–4L · 71.4% of games
4.5
44.4%
24W–30L · 46.3% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 67.4% of games
7.5
75%
9W–3L · 57% of games
8.5
55%
11W–9L · 50.3% of games
9.0
80%
4W–1L · 53.3% of games
9.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
45 matches
#2 Singles
17%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova