← Search

Tamie Nash

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 72W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tamie Nash to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
W
2026-09-11 · ACP.Nash · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Devon Siege
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · TOC.Siege · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Fish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-08-28 · ACP.Nash · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · ACP.Nash · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary McCann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-07 · ACP.Nash · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Fish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · TOC.Siege · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Moreno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · ACP.Nash · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michele Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · #3 Doubles · with Bich Trigilio championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-30 · Bi.Trigilio40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Gilreath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-0
W
2026-04-17 · NMAC.Kemp · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with LUCY LAV
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-16 · Bi.Trigilio40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Trail
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-10 · NMAC.Kemp · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with LUCY LAV
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
64.9%
48W–26L · 55.4% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.3% of games
7.5
43.2%
16W–21L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
27 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer