← Search

Amanda Fish

Willow Spring, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 99W–57L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amanda Fish to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
W
2026-09-01 · TOC.Siege · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tamie Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-08-25 · TOC.Siege · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Valerie Dorrier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-21 · ACP.Nash · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allyson Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · ACP.Fish · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Angela Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-18 · TOC.Siege · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melyssa Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · ACP.Nash · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tamie Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · NMAC.Fish · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with ANUJ SHARMA mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · NMAC.Fish · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Tabelon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-31 · NMAC.Fish · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with ANUJ SHARMA mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-15 · Am.Fish40A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-30 · NMAC.Moreno · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Moreno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-27 · NMAC.Moreno · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
78.4%
29W–8L · 61.9% of games
4.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 51.1% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.1% of games
7.5
70.6%
24W–10L · 54.8% of games
8.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 52.3% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
78.9%
15W–4L · 62.5% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
43 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova