← Search

Shelley Fridley

— year-end
129 matches · 37W–92L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Shelley Fridley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Fridley/Goldmann (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Dubois
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-09 · Fridley/Goldmann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shirine Faris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Fridley/Goldmann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Pat Geldmeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-10 · Pelican Landing / Washburn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Emhardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-24 · Pelican Landing / Washburn · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Faith Apt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-17 · Pelican Landing / Washburn · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dale Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-02-11 · Pelican Landing / Washburn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Washburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-03 · Pelican Landing / Washburn · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marjie Killeen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-09 · Fridely/Goldmann (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vikki Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-2, 1-0
W
2025-10-05 · Fridely/Goldmann (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-14 · Fridely/Goldmann (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Pat Geldmeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-31 · Hendel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Buerk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Teams74 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 40.9% of games
4.0
30.7%
27W–61L · 44.9% of games
8.0
25%
4W–12L · 45.6% of games
9.0
0%
0W–5L · 23.1% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 35.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert