← Search

Adrian Moore

Saint Louis, MO
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 35W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Adrian Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
W
2026-04-19 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Lanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-08 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Lanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-22 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Lanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-5
W
2026-02-08 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Lanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-01-11 · Woodard/Feldman (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Woodard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-04 · Woodard/Feldman (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristie Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-07 · Woodard/Feldman (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Wheeland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
W
2025-11-16 · Woodard/Feldman (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Woodard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-3
L
2025-10-05 · Woodard/Feldman (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-09-14 · Woodard/Feldman (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Lanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-04-07 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristie Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-24 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
53%
35W–31L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer