← Search

Mime Ichini-Lurie

— year-end
166 matches · 94W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mime Ichini-Lurie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history166 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-27 · Marion/Ichini-Lurie · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Lurie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-20 · Marion/Ichini-Lurie · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Quigley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · Glenview Villages 4.0 Women · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Armagost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · Marion/Ichini-Lurie · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Quigley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-05 · Glenview Villages 4.0 Women · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mylan Barfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-31 · Glenview Villages 4.0 Women · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-30 · Marion/Ichini-Lurie · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Lurie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · Glenview Villages 4.0 Women · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-15 · Glenview Villages 4.0 Women · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patty Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Marion/Ichini-Lurie · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Arnold mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · Glenview Villages 4.0 Women · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Rushman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · Marion/Ichini-Lurie · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Gessel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
4.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 57.3% of games
4.5
60%
33W–22L · 55.2% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 76.2% of games
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 69.1% of games
8.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 66.8% of games
8.5
0%
0W–4L · 42.5% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
46.4%
13W–15L · 46.2% of games
8.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 64.5% of games
9.0mixed
22.7%
5W–17L · 37.6% of games
9.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
40 matches
#1 Singles
8%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe