← Search

Eileen Lombardo

Ocala, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
468 matches · 307W–161L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eileen Lombardo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history468 matches
W
2026-07-30 · CCO/Steed · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Laird mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-29 · FK/Kaul · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Harrison Lombardo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-25 · FK/Kaul · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Harrison Lombardo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · CCO/Steed · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Hewitson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-18 · FK/Kaul · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Harrison Lombardo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Elizabeth Dickerson / Daniel Clements
2026-06-26 · CCO/Steed · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Laird mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-14 · CCO Steed · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Sapienza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-07 · CCO Steed · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-05 · CCO Steed · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Steed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-31 · CCO Steed · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Sapienza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · FK Centonze 8.0 X · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andres Trias mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · FK Centonze 8.0 X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andres Trias mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams81 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.9% of games
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
79.8%
83W–21L · 59.2% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.3% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
81.8%
45W–10L · 60% of games
8.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 56.4% of games
8.5
48.9%
23W–24L · 50.8% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
67.4%
29W–14L · 58% of games
8.0mixed
66.2%
53W–27L · 56.2% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
199 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
148 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
95 matches
#1 Singles
5%
22 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer