← Search

Kelly Armagost

— year-end
237 matches · 128W–109L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kelly Armagost to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history237 matches
W
2026-06-27 · Marion/Ichini-Lurie · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Gessel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · Glenview Villages 4.0 Women · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Nathan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · Glenview Villages 4.0 Women · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mime Ichini-Lurie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-05 · Glenview Villages 4.0 Women · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elaine Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-31 · Glenview Villages 4.0 Women · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patty Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · Marion/Ichini-Lurie · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Gessel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · Glenview Villages 4.0 Women · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patty Swanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-15 · Glenview Villages 4.0 Women · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karyn Dolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · Marion/Ichini-Lurie · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Quigley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-08 · Glenview Villages 4.0 Women · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karyn Dolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · Marion/Ichini-Lurie · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Meek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · with Yvonne Schappell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams84 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 56.9% of games
4.0
47.5%
57W–63L · 49.5% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.8% of games
8.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 61.2% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.8% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
89 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
62 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal