← Search

Jamie Johnson

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 35W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jamie Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-08-25 · TPC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Cambridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-3
W
2026-07-28 · TPC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Cambridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · TPC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with EMELIA ALLEN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · TPC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arika Carrier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · TPC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Nestman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · TPC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-06 · TPC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arika Carrier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-04-29 · TPC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arika Carrier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-28 · TPC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeralyn Marchesi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · TPC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · TPC · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Nestman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · with Christina Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
72.4%
21W–8L · 58.3% of games
3.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer