← Search

Amber Nee

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 108W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amber Nee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-09-10 · ASpanjers/JWalker (Sardis) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Annie Spanjers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-09 · LQuattlebaum/Mullins (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anita Matai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-27 · LQuattlebaum/Mullins (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Schmitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Stephanie Goss / Van ONeill
2026-08-20 · ASpanjers/JWalker (Sardis) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katherine Currier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · LQuattlebaum/Mullins (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marise Kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-03 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Debra Johann
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-11 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
84.8%
28W–5L · 64% of games
3.5
82%
50W–11L · 64.6% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.7% of games
6.5
50%
15W–15L · 50.7% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 60% of the time
#1 Singles
60%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
14 matches
#2 Singles
7%
11 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams