← Search

Van ONeill

MATTHEWS, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 21W–49L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Van ONeill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-20 · LSmith/SHoelper (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Goss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-17 · BLeonnig (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Margaret Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-10 · BLeonnig (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brooke Leonnig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with CJ ONeill championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · RLinder/SPolacek (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with CJ ONeill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · RLinder/SPolacek (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with CJ ONeill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-07 · RLinder/SPolacek (Life Time) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with CJ ONeill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-04-21 · BLeonnig (Hornets Nest) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-14 · BLeonnig (Hornets Nest) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with ANGELA BOREK
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-07 · BLeonnig (Hornets Nest) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Skelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-24 · BLeonnig (Hornets Nest) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitchell Kelling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-19 · LSmith/MCampbell (Hornets Nest) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Vagnerini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–9L · 38.3% of games
4.0
24%
6W–19L · 37.8% of games
7.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 38.1% of games
3.5mixed
60%
6W–4L · 52.6% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
8 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova