← Search

Glenna Gilliam

Fort Smith, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 49W–32L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Glenna Gilliam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-08-06 · Oates/Howse/Rville/CTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-02 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · Morris/FS/CM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cristy Harp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · Gilliam/FS/Hangout · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dzung Vu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
Nathan Garner / Christy Williams
2026-07-19 · Gilliam/FS/Hangout · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dzung Vu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Morris/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chad Parks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Rahmani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-13 · Oates/Howse/Rville/CTC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · Oates/Howse/Rville/CTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Howse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · Morris/FS/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jon Hardin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.7% of games
3.0
62.2%
23W–14L · 55% of games
3.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 46.8% of games
5.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.6% of games
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.7% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
13 matches
#1 Singles
9%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe