← Search

Emillie Vick

Fort Smith, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 18W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Emillie Vick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2026-07-30 · Marcotte/FS/HO · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Taake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-21 · Williams/FS/VH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shane Irgens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · Williams/FS/VH · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Garner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
Nathan Marcotte / Lisa Parker
2026-07-09 · Williams/FS/VH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Kilgore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · Marcotte/FS/HO · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Taake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · Marcotte/FS/HO · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · Marcotte/FS/HO · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Taake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-30 · Curtis/Greenwood/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Taake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-07 · Curtis/Greenwood/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Taake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-30 · Cunningham/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Payton Goins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-03-12 · Curtis/Greenwood/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Bower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-23 · Curtis/Greenwood/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Taake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.6% of games
3.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 58.2% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
3 matches
#3 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova