← Search

Cristy Harp

Alma, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 23W–37L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Cristy Harp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-08-06 · Harp/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Neidecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morgan Kremers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-28 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Glenna Gilliam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morgan Kremers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-21 · Harp/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Pearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · Harp/FS/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deana Deramo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-12 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morgan Kremers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Harp/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Forsgren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Shell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-23 · Gilliam/FS/VBHS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Jennifer Smith / Elaine Howell
2026-04-23 · Harp/Alma/CM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacie Hamby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · Harp/FS/CM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Blanca Barroso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 42% of games
3.0
38.7%
12W–19L · 46.9% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 27.6% of games
5.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.5% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe