← Search

Chad Miller

— year-end
75 matches · 35W–40L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Chad Miller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-08-25 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-24 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Pyron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-11 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Chambless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daryl Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-04 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laurence Baird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-03 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joshua Coger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Matthew Davis / Ryan Gray
2026-07-28 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Terry Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joseph Osborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-13 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Hassler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · BH - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams60 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
52.5%
21W–19L · 49.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 34.9% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.6% of games
7.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 42.3% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe