← Search

Daryl Ingram

HOOVER, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 70W–38L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Daryl Ingram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
L
2026-08-27 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendell Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-24 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Dearing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edric Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elliott Taliaferro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-12 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edric Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chad Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-04 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matt Heydinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-03 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Hassler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-27 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blanton Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edric Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
73.8%
45W–16L · 56.8% of games
4.0
20%
2W–8L · 42.3% of games
6.5
75%
12W–4L · 57.4% of games
7.5
50%
7W–7L · 49.3% of games
3.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
30 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King