← Search

Michael Ingram

— year-end
27 matches · 21W–6L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Michael Ingram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Hoover Met - Hrynkiw/Benson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Stanford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chad Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-20 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tray Ivey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jay Gilchrist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-28 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Daryl Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-03-05 · BH - Haladwala · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Spencer Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-25 · BH - Haladwala · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Warner Huh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-18 · BH - Haladwala · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Spencer Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-01-19 · BH - Haladwala · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-08 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-10-15 · Hoover Met - Haladwala · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaden Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-19 · Hoover Met - Ingram · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with CRISTIAN SANCHEZ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams17 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 58.7% of games
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.7% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
5 matches
#1 Singles
11%
3 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert