← Search

Christopher Corts

Midlothian, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 48W–47L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Christopher Corts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
W
2026-09-12 · ACAC 8.5 Combo PK · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alex Neuwelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-08 · ACAC 8.5 Combo PK · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Scott Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with David Nedeff championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
Bhargavaram Kallam / Lee Brooks
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Quentin Carter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Belmont - Nedeff · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cliff Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-07 · ACAC Nedeff · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Almedin Muminovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-21 · Belmont - Nedeff · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with En-Tien Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-17 · ACAC Nedeff · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-08 · IND - Jorgensen - The Nomads · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lindsay Bazydlo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
David Todd / Caitlin Young
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · with Nevena Arsic championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-24 · IND - Jorgensen - The Nomads · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lindsay Bazydlo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-5
L
2026-04-23 · Belmont - Nedeff · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tommy Bader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
75%
9W–3L · 61.5% of games
4.5
33.3%
7W–14L · 45.7% of games
8.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.2% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 57.9% of games
8.5mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 54.7% of games
9.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 50.6% of games
9.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe