← Search

Catherine Bliss

Salt Lake City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
413 matches · 243W–170L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Bliss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history413 matches
L
2026-08-28 · Liberty Park-Saltzman · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Bliss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-13 · #3 Doubles · with Gretchen Soffe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-08-11 · Tri Breakers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with JaNae Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-10 · Tri Breakers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Addisyn Bliss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Katy Alder championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Gretchen Soffe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robyn Scharman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gretchen Soffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracey Valentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gretchen Soffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katy Alder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · Liberty Park-Saltzman · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Max Harnicher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams104 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
50%
4W–4L · 58.7% of games
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 59.3% of games
4.0
70%
77W–33L · 58.3% of games
4.5
45.7%
37W–44L · 47.2% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 56.4% of games
7.5mixed
50%
9W–9L · 52.8% of games
8.0mixed
44.7%
17W–21L · 50.7% of games
8.5mixed
80%
12W–3L · 62.8% of games
9.0mixed
73.9%
17W–6L · 58.6% of games
9.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
149 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
146 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
99 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams