← Search

Maria Savur

— year-end
113 matches · 70W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Maria Savur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
Christina Razook / Susan Kloepfer
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Corrado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Helgesen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Ruth Libin / Diane Fisher
2026-05-28 · Keefe · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Chun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Chun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jana Platina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
Debbie Cannavino / Lindsay Martin
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · with Helen Chun championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · WTC: Mix 7.0 Tricksters · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Aller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Meredith Safer / Audrey Smith
2026-03-22 · WTC: TriFecta-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Chun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · WTC: Mix 7.0 Tricksters · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill O'Connor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-08 · Keefe · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Keefe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-06 · WTC: TriFecta-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Chun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-02 · SOL:Nationals Mind Benders:Keefe · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 76.6% of games
3.0
91.3%
21W–2L · 70% of games
3.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 58.9% of games
4.0
27.6%
8W–21L · 44.6% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 61.3% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
26 matches
#1 Singles
21%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
21 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer