← Search

Stacey Schulman

— year-end
118 matches · 58W–60L · seasons 2017–2026

Captains: add Stacey Schulman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
W
2026-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy DiFiore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
Julianne Schmidt / Alexis London
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Berezowsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Berezowsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-17 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
Shannon Smith / Amanda Barrow
2026-03-12 · MKCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Romina Tagliabue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-11 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-23 · MKCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Romina Tagliabue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-09 · MKCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Corrado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-12-05 · MKCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Teams24 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 74.2% of games
3.5
64.8%
35W–19L · 55% of games
4.0
28.8%
15W–37L · 42.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
52 matches
#1 Singles
19%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert