← Search

Jennifer Keefe

Mamaroneck, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
308 matches · 194W–114L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Keefe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history308 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-07 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Jennifer Murphy / Amy Kline
2026-06-25 · Keefe · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Fage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Keefe · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Dvorkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-28 · Keefe · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Biggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nora Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · NRRC Backhanded Compliments 18+ 4.0 Day · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darcy Froehlich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · SOL: Mind Benders: Keefe · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Starvatow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Keefe · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Biggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-5
W
Jennifer Hoffmann / Simone Ririmasse
2026-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julianne Feder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2
L
2026-03-29 · NRRC: Starstruck · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Dvorkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-15 · NRRC: Starstruck · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Luth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-03-08 · Keefe · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Savur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams77 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
78.8%
41W–11L · 64.6% of games
3.5
66.4%
87W–44L · 55.9% of games
4.0
38.2%
26W–42L · 46.2% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
27W–12L · 58% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
131 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
97 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
72 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer