← Search

Robbie Rutherford

— year-end
120 matches · 84W–36L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Robbie Rutherford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Anderson-Ferrer/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Overton/Rogers/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Stroup/Lowell/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Waddell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-27 · Overton/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · Overton/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Overton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · Stroup/Lowell/MRC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with JANET BLUMENTHAL
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-13 · Stroup/Lowell/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rossitza Hristoskova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · Hoskyn/NLR/BP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roger Weldon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-09 · Overton/Rogers/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-06-28 · Hoskyn/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roger Weldon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · Overton/Rogers/MRC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tammy Waddell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · Ferrer-Overton/Bentonville/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Shelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams58 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 64.8% of games
3.5
60.9%
28W–18L · 56.8% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 70.2% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 71.5% of games
3.5mixed
75%
15W–5L · 62% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe