← Search

Morten Pedersen

Holly Springs, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 78W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Morten Pedersen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-09-13 · CAS.Wysocki · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with J Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · CAS.Wysocki · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rodney Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
David Anderson / Darren Koch
2026-08-09 · CAS.Wysocki · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christian Jacobsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · CAS.Labie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Winters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-19 · TOC.Clark · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michiyo Pedersen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · CAS.Labie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Winters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · CAS.Labie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ivan Lacross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · TOC.Clark · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michiyo Pedersen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Jeff Brown / Olga Tiselsky
2026-06-07 · TOC.Clark · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michiyo Pedersen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · CAS.Labie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Whited
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-25 · CAS.Wright · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · CAS.Pedersen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with J Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
59.3%
48W–33L · 53.5% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.4% of games
6.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.2% of games
7.5
31.8%
7W–15L · 45.2% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
39 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer