← Search

Nicholas Broccolo

— year-end
25 matches · 8W–17L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Nicholas Broccolo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
L
2026-04-19 · NMAC.Daniel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Hurley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-12 · NMAC.Daniel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Lage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-21 · NMAC.Daniel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor VICK
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-20 · NMAC.Daniel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor VICK
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Jim Smith / Scott Hoffman
2026-03-04 · NMAC.Daniel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Steet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-13 · TOC.Steet · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christopher DeFusco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-09 · TOC.Steet · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Mize
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Mahesh Salian / Robin Hyder
2024-03-13 · TOC.Nealis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2023-09-06 · LOCH.Kasberg · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2023-08-27 · TOC.Nealis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with W Troutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-05-15 · TOC.Nealis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Ivan Andjelkovic / Daniel McDonald
2023-05-13 · TOC.Nealis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Schraibman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 41.8% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert